Monthly Archives: August 2014

The Dangers in & Lessons of Naiveté |

President Obama’s mantra has been centered on the collective mythology; uniform application of government force will create uniformity in outcome. Intuitively, one understands that this is an absurd notion and for one very simply reason; there is no or has there ever been uniform conformity, most specifically as to outcome, amongst humans. Now then, it follows that the President clearly is repulsed by militarism believing that the collective mythology’s a far more desirable mechanism for soothing-out conflict. The construct of reality created by the adoption of these mythologies is a pure form of Naiveté and here’s why (they also serve as valuable lessons):
(1) The mythology is completely unaware or ignorant of the Systemic Order already in place.
(2) That the Systemic Order finds the myth laughable and will use it as a tool to further their own objectives.
(3) While it takes very few Conformists to create mass-chaos their lore fails to account for a simple truth: chaos is not conformity it’s actually a repudiation of it.
(4) The Myth is always defeated by the fact that, by design, humanity fails in the presence of enforced-conformity; being drawn to an ideal is far different than being forced at gunpoint.
Here’s the great Danger: Due to the Presidents Naiveté, the lessons will need to be re-learned.  The EU’s (most conspicuously, at the moment, Britain) experimentation with collective mythology is an immediate example of the danger where, at the moment, it has been determined that there are more British Militants fighting with ISIS than there are British Muslims in their Armed Services (self-destruction).
For Americans the price of silence, a form of conformance, is that the door of alternative-response-options is about to be slammed shut and, given that Mr. Obama is ill-equipped to outmaneuver the Systemic Order, their decision to force-engagement will proceed toward full-spectrum-dominance unless the American People object; absolutely object!
The following are a select group of responses to questions/comments received after the original article was published. We believe you will find them of interest.
#1: Yes, a case could be made that the U.S. MUST engage in cleaning up the Middle-East but we must first consider the origins of and U.S. State’s contribution to the problem. Is the Islamist Jihad a function of U.S. involvement (or that of the British/French/Italians beforehand) or was the emergence of Muslim Extremism (of course it’s unclear whether Muslims would acknowledge components of the Koran as a source of/for extremism) inevitable?
In the world as it presently is there appears to be little argument that whatever the mechanisms responsible for the craft being driven so far off course might be the fact is that it IS. Regardless of the what-should-have been preferences one fundamental truth must never be forgotten: extremism, in all forms, is non-responsive to pseudo academic mythologies and missives; it understands and responds to one thing and one thing only: Blunt force trauma.
In the synthetic point-n-click world of impulse-driven ambiguity touchy-feely mythologies do seem rational and achievable however this is simply the result of adopting and adapting to the mechanism of indifference. After all you can trash-talk someone with a text message without fear that they will show up at your door with a baseball bat (how uncivilized) even though, as a public service, you might actually be in need of a good butt-whooping. 
Most Americans (and many Euro’s) live an illusion and either forget or are too young to remember what the world was like without the synthetics and action was met with the absolute of consequence and ambiguity was getting two of the same baseball players in the same 10 cent “Topps”  card pack. Call it what it is and deal with it or continue to play a game of “touch” with a guy wielding a scimitar and see where it gets you! That’s all.
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
Posted in Geo-Poli, Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

ON AIR with Host Mike Miller of WIMA 1150

The Foundations Weekly OnPoint Series continues with Host Mike Miller of 1150 WIMA in Lima, Ohio and Policy Analyst, Curtis Greco. This week features “Gov. Rick Perry; Payback for Boehner vs. The Presidency threat?” This vignette appears throughout the week during Michael’s 6-9 a.m. (ET) Show. Ohio’s In-Tune & In-Touch Host, catch him Live in-market or online at
Comment:  The allocated time-slot didn’t allow for Michael and I to get into any real depth as to the legitimacy issue however if we had I would hope to have made the following points: The actions of Perry are not that dissimilar to those of Boehner, from the perspective of motivation; for a representative democracy to function as a republic there must be absolute conviction in the uniformity of the law and its applicability. The other point I would have made is that, in both instances, we are able to observe the extremes that occur when the law is not uniformly and equally applied.
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
Posted in On Point | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Lawlessness in a Police State

LRADs (Long Range Acoustic Devices), MRAPs (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles), Body Armor, M4-like Carbines and Tear-banned in combat- Gas; battlefield tested tech in the hands of your local police force. With no sympathies toward predatory opportunists intended clearly, as a component of public benefit (our body of laws), there is a place for the traditional police. However the policy of Federalizing local cops into Combat-ready squads has militarized the relationship into something akin to an occupying force.

Posted in Business Trends, Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

ON AIR with Host Joe Galuski of WYSR 106.9

Joe Galuski of 106.9WYSR, Syracuse, NY anchors a top morning show and we’re always delighted to share-the-air with him. Curtis Greco will go OnPoint with Joe this morning at 8:15 a.m. (EST) covering a few of the Day’s HOT TOPICS so be sure and Tune-In! Catch the show in-market or streaming “Live” online at

Posted in On Point | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Silent Race; Are You Stirring?

Is there a growing contempt for race-baiting? Are we nearing critical-mass on the hypocrisy of defining a conflict purely on the basis of race? Is it possible that we are nearing a time when we can distinguish between the right to be discriminating and the totalitarian regime of thought whose objective is to debase an entire people by frenetic-proxy in order to define them into manageable herds? By filling the mind with microbial fodder purely for political advantage and control; the advantage of “them” vs. “us” when the outcome of which is near total social-polarity!

Posted in Historical Reference, Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment