A Presidential Lecture; Just Enough Suspicion to Plausibly Deny!

Earlier today (6/14/16) the President performed a surgical lecture attempting what seemed to be something akin to Barry Scheck’s closing arguments at the O.J. Simpson trial; plausible deniability.

Nearly seven and one-half years into his Presidency and it appears that despite the exposure to what is likely overwhelming evidence, classified or otherwise, he continues to mischaracterize the threat, to articulate in a manner that is best described as an adolescent temper-tantrum, a position based entirely on false-conclusions or, at best, a decidedly calculated body of non-sequiturs.

To some extent I do agree that it matters not what you choose to call the Cause or the Threat as it makes little difference, but there the agreement ends as the facts remain that the threat exists and if one intends to combat a threat you must first Identify it, Farm & Coordinate Intelligence, Target the Source and then Neutralize it; end of story.

His irreverence to the facts is evident in the manner in which he responds as if every reoccurrence (of a terror event) is somehow a new or not previously identified risk when any plain-clothed rational thinking individual finds or observes the same traceable evidence that the known risk is not new at all but merely a recurring theme. The President’s response/actions can only be interpreted as to mean any one or combination of the following:

(1) that the Threat, and its infrastructure, is so great that the U.S. is incapable of addressing it head-on.

(2) that in doing so it will require a far greater (national) commitment than Politicians are willing to confess or they feel is not politically survivable.

(3) that the President is unwilling to associate with what he refers to as a “war on Islam” for fear that it risks his personal disposition and/or an uncontrollable expansion of the theater of operations.

(4) that to face, head-on, the threat risks exposing Interests who seed, for personal gain, a perpetual war on terror.

(5) a political tool for insulating Hillary from her own culpability.

(6) he risks exposing U.S. complicity. 

The American Public must understand that this issue is open-ended and will not end with the Obama Administration or any subsequent one. It will only end when the People decide that the only thing, so far, that the U.S. Government has accomplished is to prove itself incapable of responding to a threat all the while being incredibly successful at finding new and far more clever ways of entrapping the American People into believing the false-choices being presented. A method whose mastery is proving itself to be quite DEADLY!

The battle being waged is fundamentally a battle between where on one side you have Humans who rightfully expect to be able to live in relative safety, on the other side you have the Predator whose form is readily identifiable if you’re willing to think outside of the illusion put before you. 

Curtis C. Greco, Founder

This entry was posted in Geo-Poli, Poli-Philos and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *