Missiles of Miss-Direction

I’m not prone to comment on these types of day-to-day events, they come at a seemingly increasing rate that in the processes attributed to overwhelming the senses of reason, these types of news stories have become a pandemic threat. Still, I just couldn’t pass this one up, I had to express my frustration with what has become the government-approved explanation, primarily for its absurdity:  “It was from the contrails of a commercial aircraft.”  Oh dear god! A statement this benign can only be intentional! 

The bizarre explanation for the visible exhaust plume  off the coast of Southern California yesterday defies reason.  Are we completely surrounded by the machinery of lies and stupidity simultaneously administrated by an uncontrollable cabal of arrogant people? Surely, there is a reliable explanation for the event; I sure hope so! 

After all even I know it’s not a plume/contrail generated by an aircraft.  Why?  Consider the following:

1. Note that the trail/plume indicates a single exhaust port.

2. Jet fuel (basically a kerosene variant) will not create this type of concentrated plume from its exhaust.  No, this exhaust trail is from a propellant.

3. To be a vapor trail or a contrail the device must have or be fitted with a lifting surface from which to capture both the condensation AND pressure differentials required to create a vapor trail/contrail.  And if there were lifting surfaces (aka, wings, winglets or canards) there would normally be two contrails running parallel. There were none.

4. Transoceanic aircraft are required to have no less than two engines. There are no certified single jet engine aircraft in use either as civilian or commercial that are exempt from this requirement. With this fact in evidence, what remains is the military however all Naval Jet Aircraft capable of the indicated rate of climb are all two engine aircraft with one possible exception.  Do note of course that the photograph suggests a surface ignition.

5. The only exception being, for either Navy or Marine Corp use, being the Harrier however their deployment would have required an Aircraft Carrier. No nation in the world, other than the U.K. (which has only one Aircraft Carrier and it was reported to be in-port) has the equivalent model.  Reminder: Surface Ignition.   And,

4. Also, in review of the photograph, the plume is largest at its bottom and attenuates in form as the trajectory extends. This means that the source is accelerating quite rapidly from the surface of the water (remember its only 30 miles off shore) and arcing skyward. This would indicate both a sudden (ignition), uniform and sustained thrust which is not the norm for a fixed-winged aircraft.

Conclusion: This is not an aircraft, it is a missile either submarine or ship launched: end of story!

The next question of course is: Who lunched the missile?  If it wasn’t one of our own SSBN’s or Surface Ships then of course that leaves few Nations with the capacity to execute such a stunt. Moreover, recalling that this event took place within U.S. territorial waters (a scant 30 miles of the western coast of the U.S.) how is it possible that the vessel approached without detection?

Gives a whole new breadth of meaning to the concept of porous borders now doesn’t it.

Even more and with a stern objection to the ever-present threat of conspiracy theories, still it would be interesting to compare, if the photos were available, the visual evidence of the projectile used (as it has been suggested) to shoot down the TWA (flight 800) B-747 that went down off the coast of New York in July of 1996.

Whatever the outcome of either event, it should be clear to most that not an ounce of brain power has been expended in the pursuit of informing the public as to the facts!  Whatever the motivation, if the price of failure is to be paid by the American People, I for one believe they should be informed as to the cause. 

It has become a very dangerous world made ever increasingly dangerous by poor judgment, inept leadership and a rather peculiar fairy-tale like belief by the government that suggest that if we pretend it happened the way we prefer to explain it that somehow it’s as good as not having occurred at all.

But you do know better, don’t you?

Curtis C. Greco, Founder

This entry was posted in On Point and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *