Incentivize adoption of a non-specific solution to an unidentifiable consequence wholly calculated by way of unverifiable scientific-modeling funded by individual governments who possess the political muscle to enforce (upon its own populations) a revenue generating mechanism to pay for it.
The Paris Agenda is an extension of an accord created in Lima, Peru, whereby each country is to voluntarily submit an emission reduction plan otherwise known as an “INDC” (Intended Nationally Determined Contribution) however, keep in mind that no standard of measurement exists which makes it nearly impossible to measure each Nations compliance (with their stated emission reduction plan).
The entire agenda is bound together, at its core, by the agent of Intellectual-Fascism; a foundation of force that is so deeply divisive that it is at odds with itself. It’s agenda claims a unification of purpose however, it is unable to secure an identifiable cause. While it asserts, both in qualitative and quantitative terms, a certain affect it is unable to prove its own premise and so the entire concept is left only with the brutality of you’re either with us or you’re to be excised off into the oblivion of a non-human state.
Being reminded of past Fascists who, as a way of proving the success of their ideology, effectively killed-off the entirety of their opposition (Stalin comes to mind). It should be quite clear that the Climatologists have only one viable routine remaining in their quiver: tax fossil-fuel resources to such a level that mediocre alternatives are then made to look affordably efficient. Brilliant!
It’s interesting to note that several noted entities have studied the various programs tethered to these Climate Accords – MIT’s Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Changes and even the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – and the results generated were either “undetectable” or even if there were measurable reductions in global temperatures the modelling could not distinguish between regular “climate cycles” or “other causal factors.”
There are known alternatives, such as the use of Thorium, and those yet to be perfected and so why the rush to force a mediocre solution? Why not take a more calculated and deliberate approach versus the degenerative scheme of choosing among vested interests where winning is determined either in monetary or politically advantageous terms?
Good questions the answers for each, strangely enough, will likely be the root cause of other political and economic issues that remain, as well, unresolved. Expediency, for whatever the advantage, is rarely the appropriate solution.
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
