Setting aside for the moment that President Trump ignores the anemic and self-serving protocols of the predatory government bureaucracy and that his doing so allows the public to observe just how comprehensively corrupt the system is, the fact remains that regardless of which support-group one might favor it should be clear, by now, the Former FBI Director is the poster-child for the politically-corrupt second only to Messrs. McCain, Graham, Schiff and Schumer. A couple of key points, in no particular order, in support of my observation:
(1) At any level of Government, understand that a great many efforts/requests are executed by innuendo, a wink and a nod. Comey expressed concern about the unproven claim that Trump’s actions suggested to him that he wanted the Flynn investigation terminated, and that his conscience somehow was repulsed by this. Why then did Comey not take to the pen or the private leaking of what is reasonable to assume was just one of many instructions, by former A.G. Lynch, to affect any number of preferential moves favoring the Clintons regardless of the many investigation/inquires they were the subject of?
It is clear to me, and others and reasonable to assume that it was Comey’s own actions that teased Trump into believing that Comey was accessible for one-on-one discussions. Why then did Comey not make the distinction, to the President-Elect, that post-inauguration these private meetings could not occur? By the way, one on one meetings with FBI Directors (all the way back to J. Edgar Hoover) are quite common.
(2) Moreover, why did he not leak the narrative regarding the “tarmac-tea” of Lynch and Bill Clinton and the likely instructions, by Lynch, that would have barred further inquiry/investigation into the event?
(3) Now, confirmed by Comey himself, that we know he was the source of the leak does he not then prove his inherent political and self-serving – and terminally peevish – bias, an attribute he goes to great length in expressing that he is, in fact, apolitical? The most conspicuous irony is, on one hand, Comey’s claim that he is tethered to a higher purpose and then summarily breaches his asserted nobility with relative ease. By confession, he explains it away as a personal weakness being the cause for failing to uphold the higher standard; remarkably convenient and self-serving!
(4) Comey has not only demonstrated, by his actions and by confession, affirmed his comprehensively thallic regard for truth and faithful service. Are we not then also required to expect that he is a key player and intel-source for the Cabal that opposes any effort by Trump to restore credibility and purpose to the processes of government particularly when and where it favors the American People?
I found his comments regarding the Press quite unnerving: “The challenge — and I’m not picking on reporters — about writing stories about classified information is that people talking about it often don’t really know what is going on. And those of us who actually know what’s going on aren’t talking about it.” In Comeyesque-speak this translates into something akin to the following: As long as the narrative speaks to the preferred agenda we’ve no need to be concerned with the truth!
Lastly, if there was anything on Trump they’d have made sure it was leaked before he was elected. As to the former FBI Director, don’t expect Comey to suffer any real consequences (for his actions); he knows too much about too many people, he is, untouchable and he knows it!
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
