I believe that acts of insanity are necessary; they bring saneness in dealing with all things trivial! Ironically, Trump is exactly the type of character that can pull-off necessity precisely because no one expects him to be successful and also due to the fact that pundits will see him as having too much to lose however, here too, it is precisely because he has much at stake, and the fact that his nature loathes bureaucracies, that he will have a cannot-fail approach.
Here are the dangers:
(1) If he’s in purely to punish someone (Clinton and/or Bush) and has intention of going the distance.
(2) His fundamental understanding of economic and fiscal realities exposes the top tier candidate’s incompetence as well as their link to global financial interests which then drives would-be voters away from the 2016 poles.
(3) the net effect of all this would cause a Ross Perot-like schism allowing Hilary Clinton to win the White House at an ultra-low voter participation factor that makes her esteemed husband Bill’s first term win of Bush-the-Elder a landslide.
Already the statist media is berating Trump as a non-candidate which then should make one question their qualifying standards given that there are only two qualified candidates (excluding Trump) on the horizon and one of them hasn’t yet committed to running (Gov. John Kasich, R-Oh).
To keep the two-party system from a complete collapse and to prevent the complete emersion of the U.S. into a global uber-structure, a major departure from the expected must take place in November 2016. That option will not be among the choices typically offered; it will always, particularly in a climate of perversion, be an atypical choice.
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
