Monthly Archives: April 2015

GOP Heading To Fail

Posted on April 13, 2015 by Curtis Greco

RNC Chair Reince Preibus demonstrates GOPs tendency for self-destruction. His pronouncement that Mrs. Clinton is “about the best person we could possibly hope for” telegraphs that the GOP strategy is to run against Hillary instead of running on a specific plan for restoring the American public’s faith in representative government.

If the GOP is bent on blood-sport politics then they will lose the White House in 2016 primarily because voters will not turn out for the GOP offering and Hillary will win atop the GOP’s failure to connect.

Curtis C. Greco, Founder

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Clinton Samples the Inequality of Equality

Posted on April 11, 2015 by Curtis Greco

Chelsea Clinton’s cover appearance on the May issue of Elle settles it; the Clinton Fantasy Machine is in churn-n-burn mode. Complete with the classic clintonesque non-sequitur, the former first daughter peevishly demonstrates the she’s teaming well with this prolific spawning-machine of terminal division; “since when did 20 percent become the definition of equality?”

This is yet another seedling looking to take root in the toxic soil where baiting the public conscience with yet another false premise divides and draws the public into a baseless, completely fabricated, argument. In a mindset that crafts the notion of equality and defines the same by whatever distortion a social accommodation can provide is itself both a non-sequitur and a false premise or, simply, an outright lie.  Read more...

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Iran: Mutually Assured Contention

Posted on April 3, 2015 by Curtis Greco
U.S./West Cold War strategy secretly equipped Israel with nuclear capabilities the purpose of which was to direct a stand-off threat toward the U.S.S.R. It should then come as no surprise that Russia would look for the same facility, with the help of various not-so-black vesicles, to counter the move.
The great Danger accompanying Mr. Obama’s myopia is twofold (primarily):
(1) he’s hopelessly anchored to a virulent contempt for U.S. Military-Intelligence-backed hegemony.
(2) he and his coterie are completely ill-equipped to grasp the ultra-frenetic weave of cross-purpose-interests that defines the malignancy that is the geo-political-economic sewer.
Although I am fully convinced that Mr. Obama’s firmly corrupted intent is to lie waste to the U.S. socio-political structure, I do not believe he intends to walk the planet into a nuclear confrontation. However, mutually assured contention, as we continue to experience, easily overrides rational thought and always at the expense of the American people’s best interests. The so-called Iran Nuke Deal is, in every way, an affirmation and a predictable extension of this “great danger.”
The following are a select group of responses to questions/comments received after the original article was published. We believe you will find them of interest.
#1: As we stated at the time of the red-line breach of Assad (Syria), met by yet another non-response from the U.S. Administration, it is “…inevitable that in the not too distant future we will see Iran move to fill the vacuum created by the U.S. absence; this will be most visible as Iran works to topple unstable U.S.-backed regimes in Iraq, Yemen and Qatar. A move, by Iran, in this direction will bring the threat to the doorsteps of Saudi Arabia which, due to the absent American presence, will force a military response by the Saudi’s and into a direct confrontation with Iran. The U.S. has a security agreement that guarantees an American Military Response to a direct threat aimed at Saudi Arabia. If Mr. Obama takes the same foreign policy approach he applied to Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Egypt then that will leave one last man standing; Israel.”  
#2: In this single point there is no excess in any efforts to emphasize that, in no way, can Iran or any other country, be permitted to develop or possess militarized nuclear capabilities.  To do so, particularly in any volatile region, is to allow the proliferation of a regional and global threat that cannot be contained.
#3: There is yet another point that needs mention as well: What of the security risks to those countries within reach of an Iranian nuclear tipped ICBM? If this country would challenge any Nation posing a threat to its existence then how, in good faith/conscience, can this Nation’s people stand idly by when their representatives license, by their actions, a direct threat to a defenseless people?  We will continue, in ways too numerous to count, to pay a price for our self-imposed tolerance. 
Curtis C. Greco, Founder

 

Posted in Geo-Poli | Tagged , , | Leave a comment