For the most part, Politicians are a gamey group; by the second term (if not sooner) they share many of the same enigmatic elements. Many, it would seem, begin their political careers with pure or true intentions and yet once within the sphere where policing aborts reason and faithfulness a transformation occurs.
The disappointment seems inevitable after all I think it’s fair to say that anytime you look for consensus by appealing to the lowest possible common denominator it should come as no surprise that the outcome is indeed the lowest possible.
The Political theater has become a weigh station of a sort, and no Party is immune to the same risks, a place not for the pure ambition of public service but more so a place for career realignment, a buffet were power and money are served open-face and for the taking.
The Public needs to reacquaint itself with the process and develop and understanding of the Politician. To spend some time on the matrix, the dynamic properties that drive this Breed. Government, and I’m speaking of U.S. Representative (style) government, for far too long been left to linger aimlessly. It’s important to understand what drives the culture that has allowed it to spin so wildly off course. The following schedule represents a series of filters I use when I’m studying the different characters as work to mature an understanding of their motives and how to best anticipate what their next move might be.
1. The apostatic preference; the convenient abandonment of moral courage:
Sound Government requires, absolutely, Legislators/Jurists in possession of sound moral convictions. The Moment a Politician trades their moral convictions for an outcome they have neither.
2. Fear of anonymity:
The “Deep State” prizes its anonymity. The fiercest battles we face are not those we can target, they’re the ones we don’t even know that are there. Most Politicians will trade their anonymity for the influence the exchange provides. The problem, then, becomes that every trade thereafter binds them to switch over from preserving their character to the worst of all, protecting the system.
3. The certainty of unaccountability:
Right after one questions “why” there’s so much corruption they move immediately to “why” no one is every held to account for it? It’s very simple: the more people the system can corrupt the greater your protection against detection becomes. Where no accountability exists, are you not free to do as you wish?
4. Cross-Collateral assurance:
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” The “Deep State” survives largely untouched and will continue to do because it understands the truth and effectiveness of this phrase. Politicians that are corruptible provide the DS with all the security it needs. The Politicians have become collateral, the wager that buys the DS all the protection it requires.
5. The seduction of power:
The surrender of One’s Moral Compass occurs because of the want of influence. political influence is intoxicating as it buys you money, power and, for a time, unaccountability and so? So why not!
Now then, think of the following with the aforementioned point in mind:
An individual (Kamala Harris) the Public has universally found to be contemptable is now, suddenly, held up as the second coming of Obama.
The power of Corporate Media is frightening.
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
The content, in its entirety, of this site is expressly reserved by © 2024 Curtis C. Greco and © 2024 The Imperfect Messenger Foundation ™.
