Category Archives: Poli-Philos

Congress on DHS – Where Parading Substitutes for Principal

Although Sen Harry Reid (D-NV), former Senate Majority Leader, holds the historical distinction of being on the nation’s Top Ten Most Divisive list, the current Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, appears destined to the ranks of the tactically challenged. In an era where a developing security threat is a mere ten second sound-bite away why would you ever consider using DHS Funding as a tool for political hostage taking?

In a Representative Constitutional Republic (such as the U.S. design intended), abuse of power is the single greatest and most corruptible risk for which there is no defense. The President’s use of Executive Authority as a mechanism for altering Federal Immigration Law is a most corruptible abuse of power.

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Iran Deal: Unwinding Gravity!

Americans rarely want to see their President fail; personally, I’d prefer that history record each Presidents term in office as a continuation of our self-perfecting ambitions, our national legacy of success. Unfortunately, President Obama has been deluded into believing that he possesses the powers akin to that of an alchemist; the ability to completely reverse the order of rule without consequence. Not as a matter of defiance but more so from a position simply stated as expectancy. He actually expects that by the mere act of having spoken that all order, having been the common practice(s) of the universe, will summarily suspend taking the predictability of consequence along with it.
In a nut shell: The President has decided to anoint the Islamic Republic (a contradiction in terms) of Iran as Regional Robo-Cop of the Middle-East. He believes that his personal currency of caricaturized-intellect is sufficient to suspend both history and the historical order-of-rule which has always accompanied Militarized Islamic Regimes, always.
Suspending Iran’s nuclear capacity may sound like a yippee-moment, but understand this: it does nothing to address their existing capability or to eliminate their ability to unleash or resume the processes and it does nothing to sanitize the eternal Sunni-Shiite conflict that exists throughout the entire Islamic World. Any Deal with Iran, particularly when we consider the only issues being negotiated are those which Iran’s Khomeini will consider, serves only to further diminish U.S. prestige and credibility which, under the present Administration, has never been lower. Desperation-for-a-deal, by Obama’s negotiating team, has had a devastating effect on what would otherwise have been an overwhelming position of strength for the U.S. One might characterize this as nothing more than a hungry child begging a bully for his lunch-money the worm just stole from him; a tragic role reversal for the United States.
It gets worse; Obama’s anointing of Iran is seen as an insult to Saudi Arabia. Recall that the U.S. (circa 1973) made a perpetual defense agreement with Saudi Arabia whereby the U.S. would guarantee their security in exchange for anchoring the trading of OPEC oil to the U.S. dollar (a.k.a., Petro Dollar). This is the genesis of both the dollar as the worlds reserve currency and the open licensing of print on demand U.S. Monetary Policy. Obvious as the risk should be nonetheless, Mr. Obama seems completely ignorant of the global economic consequence his selective unwinding of gravity will have, specifically as it relates to what’s left of the U.S. economy and the tattered middle-class.
One minor shift in the manner in which oil is traded will have catastrophic consequences for the U.S. dollar and this is precisely what Russia, China and the E.U. would love to see happen. It’s so very difficult for Americans as they continue to endure, that while their leaders claim to love America they consistently act as if the American people are their enemies.
The following are a select group of responses to questions/comments received after the original article was published. We believe you will find them of interest.
#1: Many have often expressed concerns as to the massive global debt denominated in U.S. dollars (estimated to be in the neighborhood of $950 Trillion) and wondering how it would ever be possible to pay this off. The fact is that it was never, ever, planned that the debt would be paid off; it would be vaporized by way of an economic collapse no different than it has occurred in the past. Ironically though, it is individual wealth that is vaporized, but not the practices that lay behind the process that feeds off its occurrence.
Obama, like most Presidents before him, and Congress have been either willing or ignorant participants in the process. What has long been planned is coming to a wallet near you; oh it will appear to be U.S. currency, but it will be regulated by the IMF who will integrate the administration of all national/regional currency(s) thru the use of what, in simplest terms, is unitized valuation (per currency unit) based on a basket or “blending” of all currencies.  More on this another time. 
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
Posted in Geo-Poli, Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Elizabeth Warren: More Dangerous than Hilly?

Yes, in the category of nuances to anoint, Ms. Warren is nothing more than another devotee of change drawing from the very same microbial reservoir of lesions as Mr. Obama and for that matter, at least one third of Congress. How conveniently coy as she cleverly scripts the ever elusive high-road in the form of an emergency post-mortem rife with selective targeting (see the article/link below). Though few of her growing fan-base are aware of or dare consider the following:

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Brian Williams – The Greater Rule of Duty; Broken!

The First Amendment protects Free Speech and, among other points, it provides an affirming sanctuary for The Press. Typically one finds both of these components conjoined such as in the case of Larry Flynt (of Hustler magazine fame) and offensive as it may be, to protect the right of the unseemly and the sensational.
So the question is this: Is Brian Williams actions (no different than any other media personality or politician) more an issue of duty than it is a matter of truth-telling? Given the manner in which the breach has been handled, by either Williams or NBC, I believe we are obligated to extend our inquiry a bit further. We should ask if the core issue of the Williams/NBC response is more a function of economics or are their reactions truly an affirming demonstration of a core feature long held to be a necessary component of a true democracy, the duty of the press to faithfully inform the public, and also an effort to demean the use of sensationalism as a tool for contorting the shape of public opinion?
Do we accept, perhaps even tolerate that we expect the bias of misstatements simply because we’ve come to prefer that the illusion continuing uninterrupted?  If so then the real problem is not Brian Williams or NBC (or any element of the media or political bouillabaisse). Mired within the illusion is the faithfulness of truth; peril unseen and unspoken yet no less absolute.
Whatever your perspective may be it remains inevitable that we will no less proceed at our own and individual risk. Even if the lie is repeated with sufficient frequency and ultimately is accepted as the truth, it remains, as an absolute, that the foundational reference upon which it rests remains a lie. Contradictions do not exist.
“Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong.” -Ayn Rand
Posted in Business-Philos, Poli-Philos | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The State of Leadership – Failure’s Support System

Absent a common ambition any interest can be served; for a time!

The notion of diversity, seemingly hip and peevishly altruistic, is nothing more than functional lethargy overtaking the natural order of form. The charade that is diversity is right up there with the iconic and authoritative defense often raised and known as a Conspiracy Theory.

In truth, if you care to consider the theory, isn’t any/every outcome a conspiracy? The deliberate ambition of those preferring one outcome over that of another’s, have they, forces and interests, not conspired to affect their cause? In either instance the outcome is still the same; the overtaking of the natural order of functional form.

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment