Category Archives: Poli-Econ

What to Expect from Trade Deal Passage

Since 1992, with the passage of WTO, GATT, NAFTA & CAFTA, U.S. Domestic Economic Wealth (True Capacity), Inflation & Gov’t Spending Adjusted, has plummeted by 46 percent (conservatively calculated, depending on the economic components included in the calculation, it could be as high as 69.4).
With the passage of TPA & TAA you will see a rapid approval and passage of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the Trade in Service Agreement (TiSA). Each of these three agreements are administered by third party commissions, like their predecessor Trade Agreements (which is why you have a “do nothing” Congress as there is little domestic range of authority remaining that doesn’t in some way come into contest with the external trade authority) vested with the authority to force suspension of any Domestic Law.
The only way out is to suspend U.S. participation which is not as easy as you might hope. Here’s what to expect over the next 5-10 years:
(1) Trade Authority used to void U.S. Immigration and alter Labor Laws.
(2) 25-30% reduction in labor participation rate as influx of “permitted-status” explodes to meet lower wage demands.
(3) Increase social disorder/conflicts along with the predictable growth in Gov’t Social Programs intended to meet demands of excised workers (unemployed) and mediate increasingly contentious social disorder.
(4) No beneficial changes to Corporate Tax code as “commission” deems this effort adverse to multi-nationals interests.
(5) Enforcement of globalized standards seen as integral to the consolidation of control over global property, product, resource, legal, economic, financial and ultimately the flow and application of human capital.
(6) Expansion of revenue-generating (tax) authority applicable to Individual/Private transactions (in addition to existing).
(7) Rapid population growth in Metro areas caused by increase in Gov’t dependency the effect of which will insure an irreversible establishment of a non-democratic voting block.
(8) Collapsing of the E.U. into the ward established by the TTIP which will then merge the administrative authority of the TPP into the same collective.
(9) As part of or as a precursor to item “8” you will see the suspension of all Sovereign National Debt with/to the IMF the purpose of which will be to preserve and revalidate the dominance of the Western Fractional Banking System; it will be made to appear as if it is the only viable alternative to a global economic collapse.
(10) Expect to witness the break-up of the Russian Federation and the emergence of multiple U.N./NATO aligned States.
(11) Communist China’s efforts to maintain its administrative control will fail as internal pressures resulting from a massive internal banking collapse, massive wealth-disparity, external manipulation of internal economic segments, to name a few, all of which will reveal that China is, and never was, the economic/military threat that had been reported; it will, like the former members of the Russian Federation, merge into the IMF-administered financial system.
(12) U.S. will re-establish a significant military/naval presence in/at its former bases in the Philippines.
This process, is, of course an inevitable evolution of a process started long ago and little, short of a comprehensive push-back by the American people (which unfortunately is unlikely) will not alter the course. To survive and prosper in this tumultuous age will require a firm and unyielding grasp of one’s sovereign individuality and know that the American Ideal is just that, an Ideal.
It is an elegant composition of the Divine’s ambitions never able to have been preserved by an inanimate entity (Government) which has no vested interest in its preservation; for you however it is an absolute necessity. You are, have been and will always be the single outlet thru which the Divine Ideal is expressed. Remember, “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s,…” understanding that Caesar was never able to survive outside of an ideal-Ideal which is precisely why all nations, ultimately, fail. They believe that their success entitles them to breach the fundamentals and as you know, no one escapes the consequences of having done so!
The following are a select group of responses to questions/comments received after the original article was published. We believe you will find them of interest.
#1: Doom and gloom? Absolutely NOT! It’s an exciting time full of unlimited opportunities to evolve past the state of mediocrity. Sure, the change-over is going to be unsettling for many however, the predators will ultimately be rewarded their just rewards. It’s important to know what’s being done so that one can orientate themselves in the appropriate direction!
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
Posted in Geo-Poli, Poli-Econ, Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Establishments Latest Carcass is Rep. Paul Ryan!

Let’s be clear; free and open trade is a good thing for any functional free-market economy which by its nature requires, just to name a few, fluid capital and investment funded development, adaptive productive capacity, pro-generative intellectual capacity, domestically deferential legal & regulatory order and a skilled/capable work-force equitably compensated.
Now then, as Rep. Ryan has become the more conspicuous outlet for the Free-Trade-Open Border-Domestic Harvesting-Establishment’s talking-points it is completely evident that he hasn’t a clue as to what he’s talking about and ignorant of the fact that none of the very same arguments used to support previous trade agreements/promises have never come to fruition, e.g., increased jobs, increased economic status and so on. It is true that Multi-Nationals have had stunning performance outcomes from trade agreements most dramatically since Bill Clinton’s WTO/GATT of the early 1990’s however, the “jobs of the future” promised then, as now, will never materialize and for one very good reason which is that the massive economic growth has been almost entirely in two sectors: Financial Institutions and Imported Consumer Products. Both of which offer no domestic over-growth potential and this is due to the fact that Financial Institutions which bank on the exchange of capital exclusively driven by and dependent upon inflationary-forces and the other, Consumer Products, merely consume wealth; they do not create it.
Sure, 1 in 5 jobs created may be attributable to trade deals however when you consider that they are located in either of these two sectors then what value do they offer to the overall domestic economic system?  The answer is quite simple: ZERO! In fact, when you consider that government has now become the most-favored-tool for filling the economic void – evidenced by 51.7 percent of the American public receiving some form of government assistance – it is easy to understand why the economic decline continues to accelerate.
Here’s what is taking place before your very eyes: The Banking System in the midst of perfecting its international hold and doing so in order to preserve its economic hegemony and, along with its various industry related accomplices, composed the global multi-national modeling-myth including the various fantasy non sequiturs so as to make it all seem an inevitable necessity. Intuitively, of course, you know it’s a fraud; all you have to do is look at your savings account, the down-grading of your economic outlook, the non-productive level of college graduates, decaying infrastructure, drop in homeownership and so on and so on.
All of this begs the following question:  If trade deals are so good for the American Public then why is it there is no single indication that the American public has benefited from them, Rep. Ryan? The response to this question, inevitably, is typically something having to do with “…the public benefits from cheaper prices” which of course is a horrifically weak response given that with no alternative from which to measure by comparison the only viable answer made available becomes the only choice from which to choose.
The reason Paul Ryan, not unlike a majority of the House and/or Senate, speak as they do is they haven’t the capacity of discrimination-by-contrast from which to know that the rhetoric they are spewing is only because they’ve not pursued alternatives apart from the only choice they’ve been given and that’s no choice at all!
Curtis C. Greco, Founder
Posted in Poli-Econ | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Trade Adjustment Assistance Program – A Prelude to Disaster

The TAAP has seen little media coverage; surprised? As if no greater indicator of the devastating effects expected with the passage of the Trans Pacific Partnership (and giving the President Fast Track Authority) were required, concerned Americans should (still) consider this: The TAAP is a Bill that would provide aid to people/workers displaced by trade deals.

Posted in Poli-Econ | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Betrayal of Economic Policy

The link (below) is to an article appearing in The Seattle Times, “Low wages, trade deals luring…” and though from April 2015 the article remains an important read; it is well written and sourced. For those who are interested in building a better economic understanding it is a piece of solid perspective and as the Trade Deal (a.k.a., Trans Pacific Partnership/TPP) vote nears it is important for the public to have a solid foundation on a subject that has been completely surrendered to the appeal of donor-laced political favoritism. As you read the article you will want to keep the following few points in mind:

Posted in Poli-Econ | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Trans Pacific Partnership – You’ll Need to Pass it to Learn What’s In It!

Seems as if the errors of the past have become the standard to keep in DC as we discover the growing numbers of Congressmen (not unlike their brethren in the Senate) who are preparing for a pro-TPP vote without having bothered to read the agreement (those who’ve openly confessed: Rep  M. Walters (R-Ca), Rep P. Sessions (R-Tx), Rep S. Scalise (R-La). And quite possibly Rep K McCarthy (R-Ca) a Rep J. Boehner (R-Oh) both of whom who’ve refused to answer the did-you-read-the-proposed legislation question).

Posted in Poli-Econ, Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment