Category Archives: Poli-Philos

If You Knew Then What You Know Now; Idiotic Notions!

With no defense of the indefensible intended this particular type of query is pure poison. It’s symptomatic of  congenital ignorance and I’ve been hoping that someone (Media) would have picked up on it and call it what it is (or isn’t), but alas it appears not and so here goes.

The question that Bush, Clinton or any other stooge-like candidate should be asked is this: Knowing what you know now what other type of manufactured crisis would have come along and knowing that the entire scheme is meant and intended only to continue the political/economic flogging into submission of any entity willing to challenge the global consolidation of western-style finance and political demagoguery, would you have (still) gone along with it?  Now that’s the question that needs asking!

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Bush: Hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest!

A fabulous Paul Simon lyric giving texture to the meaningless and the mindless. Leadership is meeting people where they are and drawing them an uplifting picture meant to familiarize them with the remarkably possible.

Bush, like and as with the custom of his political peers, won’t risk being a standout on leadership terms instead opting for the mediocre undertow of targeted ambiguity. The distinction being, if one is willing to endure Fox News (Megyn Kelly) interview of the former Florida Governor you’ll observe the process in action. How common it has become for political speak to deliver absolutely no inspiring/compelling message whatsoever. As if reading from the same political survivor handbook, Bush, like Clinton, believes they can appeal to the Voter thru attrition; outlasting their incredible weaknesses by regulating media access.

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

First Amendment: Terror in Texas!

Freedom of Speech, as intended by Constitutional Design (Bill of Rights), is to protect open dissent and opinion without which the free exchange of or challenge to opinion could not occur without risk of government sanction. There is however, limits to expression and we observe these limits in cases where libelous claims are made. To suggest that speech or actions that insight adverse action or outcome is protected speech clearly takes the First Amendment argument beyond its ideals.

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Baltimore: War on Poverty

As is often the case every social failure is articulated as a function of money; not enough spent. Since the dawn of LBJ’s War on Poverty (circa 1964) the U.S. Taxpayer has spent $22 Trillion on various anti-poverty programs and the result has proven the entire affair, like most government programs, to be a stunning failure. The only success being that poverty, as a politically demeaning attribute, is now so perfectly systemic that the systemic bureaucracy that has grown up from the war on poverty itself survives only by breeding a perpetual poverty state.

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court Trending Social

The question is whether or not the Supreme Court should ever speak to or address evolving social trends. Is the U.S. Constitution an article of governance or was it intended as an omnipotent, ever-evolving, behavioral endorsement-tool? If one were to study the Federalist Papers then it will be clear that though the Constitution is indeed an article of governance it is most important to understand that it addresses the scope of governance; quite specifically it attends to the limited domain in which government is permitted to function.

Posted in Poli-Philos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment